Differences between abstinent and non-abstinent individuals in recovery from alcohol use disorders

 

 

 

Meenakshi Sabina Subbaraman, Jane Witbrodt

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 39, Issue 12, December 2014

 

 

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460314002159

 

 

Highlights

•Length of time in recovery and the probability of abstinence are positively related.

•Quality of life in abstinent recovery is better than in non-abstinent recovery.

•Time in recovery should be accounted for when examining correlates of recovery.


Abstract

 

Objective

Non-abstinent goals can improve quality of life (QOL) among individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUDs). However, prior studies have defined “recovery” based on DSM criteria, and thus may have excluded individuals using non-abstinent techniques that do not involve reduced drinking. Furthermore, no prior study has considered length of time in recovery when comparing QOL between abstinent and non-abstinent individuals. The current aims are to identify correlates of non-abstinent recovery and examine differences in QOL between abstainers and non-abstainers accounting for length of time in recovery.

 

Sample

A large (N = 5380) national sample of individuals who self-describe as “in recovery” from alcohol problems recruited in the context of the What Is Recovery? (WIR) study.

 

Method

Multivariate stepwise regressions estimating the probability of non-abstinent recovery and average quality of life.

 

Results

Younger age (OR = 0.72), no prior treatment (OR = 0.63) or AA (OR = 0.32), fewer dependence symptoms (OR = 0.17) and less time in recovery all significantly (P < 0.05) related to non-abstinent recovery. Abstainers reported significantly (P < 0.05) higher QOL than non-abstainers (B = 0.39 for abstinence vs. non-abstinence), and abstinence was one of the strongest correlates of QOL, even beyond sociodemographic variables like education.

 

Conclusions

Non-abstainers are younger with less time in recovery and less problem severity but worse QOL than abstainers. Clinically, individuals considering non-abstinent goals should be aware that abstinence may be best for optimal QOL in the long run. Furthermore, time in recovery should be accounted for when examining correlates of recovery.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Human Services and Justice Coordinating Committee

www.hsjcc.on.ca/